Skip to content

Conversation

@saltenasl
Copy link
Member

@saltenasl saltenasl commented Oct 28, 2025

This reverts commit 39cb173.

The release failed due to publish-npm step failing.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Revert
    • Version rolled back to 0.1.0

This reverts commit 39cb173.
@saltenasl saltenasl requested a review from a team as a code owner October 28, 2025 18:55
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 28, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The package version is downgraded from 0.2.0 to 0.1.0 in package.json. Correspondingly, all changelog entries under the 0.2.0 header are removed from CHANGELOG.md, including the associated merged PRs list and contributors section. These are metadata-only changes with no functional code modifications.

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "Revert 'Publish 0.2.0'" directly and accurately describes the main change in the pull request. The changeset confirms this by removing the 0.2.0 changelog entry and downgrading the version from 0.2.0 to 0.1.0 in package.json, which are exactly the changes expected from reverting a failed 0.2.0 release. The title is concise, uses a conventional revert prefix, and provides sufficient context for understanding the PR's purpose without being vague or generic.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 39cb173 and 4a2234f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (0 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: check_release
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

3-3: Version downgrade aligns with revert scope.

The version change to 0.1.0 is appropriate for reverting the failed 0.2.0 release.

Please verify:

  1. That 0.1.0 was indeed the prior stable version (check git tags/history)
  2. Whether 0.2.0 was published to the npm registry and requires unpublishing or deprecation
  3. That CHANGELOG.md changes (mentioned in the summary) align with this version revert

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 69.56%. Comparing base (39cb173) to head (4a2234f).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #62   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   69.56%   69.56%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines         253      253           
  Branches       28       28           
=======================================
  Hits          176      176           
  Misses         73       73           
  Partials        4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@saltenasl saltenasl merged commit 7f56fd1 into main Oct 28, 2025
14 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants